Journal article

False consciousness, hermeneutical injustice, and ideological power

Published in Philosophy & Social Criticism

Abstract

Theories of ideology explain the stability of unjust social institutions by reference to the ways in which social power undermines the epistemic agency of those subordinated by them. The historically dominant model of ideology understands it as ‘false consciousness’, that is, as a set of socially distorted beliefs. The false consciousness model of ideology is, however, unsatisfactory in various respects. I argue that this, in part, explains why theorists have more recently turned to a competing model that understands the epistemic constraints caused by relations of social power in terms of hermeneutical injustices. While Fricker’s theory of hermeneutical injustice avoids some implausible assumptions of false consciousness theories, it lacks, however, a plausible account of how social power can distort hermeneutical resources. I argue that there is a competing model of ideology in the Marxist tradition, according to which ideologies arise from distortions of concepts that are internal to social practices; this model takes up the insights from theories of hermeneutical injustices, and supplements them with a convincing ‘materialist’ explanation of how power, practices, and discourse are linked.

Publication details

Date of publication
19 Dec 2024
Publication link
View publication
Publisher
SAGE Publications Ltd

Bibliometrics

OpenAlex

View record
Citation count
11
Collected 2026-08-22
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.30
Collected 2026-08-22
Citation percentile
97.8%
Percentile among comparable publications of the same age and field.

About FWCI: Field-Weighted Citation Impact compares citations received with the number expected for a work of the same type, year, and subfield. A value of 1.0 represents the world average.

Google Scholar

View record
Citation count
5
Collected 2026-08-16